Has anyone here had good success with LOW HAZE models such as the HP 25er and 25f?
One of the reasons people may be finding relief with MVA panels could be the lower haze used on the front.
I notice a good improvement going from my hazy HP to my low haze HP.
See this article: https://pcmonitors.info/articles/matte-vs-glossy-monitors/

The low haze HP has only 1 to 5% haze while a standard IPS has 25% haze. The HP I have with low haze has a luxurious feeling about it.

When I'm using it now I do feel some tension stimulation in one of my temples, but I didn't get enough sleep last night.

Please share your own experiences with LOW HAZE units. Have you found them substantially more comfortable than matte screens?

19 days later

Once again I swapped my main low haze screen for a normal matte screen so that I have them side by side but with the matte screen as my main monitor. Once again, the difference is staggering. I really think the haze on most screens is causing eye strain for many. The low haze screen looks much clearer and allows the eyes to relax. The matte screen definitely strains my eyes. Otherwise both are rather similar HP units with IPS panels.

I wonder if VA is generally considered more comfortable versus IPS because the VA panels have a different anti-glare finish, or the VA contrast is able to overcome the finish in a way the IPS fails.

5 years later

I like low haze or glossy screens and need to replace my old 25" HP low haze with something new. Any suggestions?

dev