cooldudz Sounds right to me. I can get a stinging in my eyes from Moto LCD's that isn't apparent with the XP Pro.
Moto LCD's use much thinner glass.
As well, if I use my desktop monitors in the dark, I get similar stinging that improves when I enable Night Light. Night Light not only filters the screen to be more red-orange, but considerably decreases the amount of light shining out of the screen.
It's a pain manually adjusting the brightness of desktop monitors depending on ambient lighting, but for sure using them without any lights on, without simultaneously lowering their brightness, increases eye strain.
I haven't tried, but I would be curious if a Moto LCD with a glass screen protector is almost or just as comfortable as the XP Pro. If you add a glass protector to a Moto, the screen in theory should be very similar to the XP Pro, unless there is some other factor I am missing.
Yes, the Moto may have higher peak brightness, but lowering the brightness should yield acceptable results since there is no PWM dimming. Even so, many say Moto LCD's bother them, and I wonder if a simple glass screen protector is all that is needed to fix that discomfort.
Another thing to try is FL-41 Rose Glasses.
People try out the Moto LCD's, say they bother them, and return them. They tend not to try a glass protector or computer glasses before sending them back. However, they should. It makes sense to me most consumer phones are using overly thin glass. Most desktop monitors too.
Thicker glass gives you more of a barrier between you and the backlight. I don't see how it would hurt and I can see how it will help.