AgentX20 hey did you find a solution to this? literally just happened with me and my 2017 Macbook Air...

    devilgrove hey did you find a solution to this? literally just happened with me and my 2017 Macbook Air...

    I'm now running a fairly clean Mojave install and it's A-OK (for me). [touch wood]

      poliakov I dont want to get ahead of myself, but I must say you might be onto something with the switchresx and the fact that it has to be exactly half of native resolution (and set to the non HDPI option in that resolution).

      I will test this with the most difficult task for my eyes on new tech - writing and reading, and report here if that is successful. The enlarged and visible pixels definately help with eye fixation.

      If its annoying and uncomfortable but doesnt trigger a bad headache like the normal resolution, then this is a definite breakthrough.

      AgentX20 I tried that too, didn't work sadly, especially cause Mojave used to work for me perfectly. Glad you found a solution though.

        devilgrove I tried that too, didn't work sadly, especially cause Mojave used to work for me perfectly. Glad you found a solution though.

        It's just as well it works otherwise I'd have no 'work' computer to speak of...! [big phew]

        4 months later

        JTL

        I have iPhone XS, weirdly it causes me no symptoms provided reduce white point is on and brightness is low. I’m completely stuck finding a laptop to work on though :-(

        6 months later

        bkdo

        Please, tell us model of display in your mbp 2015. You can find it in color profile and using terminal. Tell both

        • bkdo replied to this.

          AgentX20 Please tell

          mbp 2013 early or late 2013. Can use also check display manufacturer? It's really important for me

            Marionberry998

            It is an early 2013 MacBook Pro with a GeForce 650M GPU and Intel HD Graphics 4000.

            I know I looked at the panel manufacturer years ago but I cannot remember what it was. I know I tried to pull that info a while back without success and I concluded that the commands people used don't perhaps work any more.

            If I get a bit of time tomorrow I'll give it a go.

              AgentX20

              Go to setting-display-color profile open standart colour profile (the first one) - then click at 17 line (mmod), information will be there

                Marionberry998

                Here's what I got:

                And to your other question - yes I have tried a few other MacBook Pros of similar vintage. None have felt as good as this one I'm using, but then I've also not been able to easily check on the panel manufacturer.

                I hope this is helpful, and if you do know how to decode the info above do please post it as it could be helpful with my own investigations.

                  AgentX20

                  Yes, thank you a lot. I've tried quiet a lot screens, and now I stopped at Macbooks. It seems, like I found some usable models. And I check each of them for precise display model number.

                  The information you gave is very important. To test more MacBooks I need to order them by mail, so I need to know what to order.

                  Could you, please, also check the display using terminal?

                  I can order early 2013 15" A00F with Nvidia video card. (We are taking about 15" right?)And it's LP154WT1-SJA2. I guess, a display in that Mac also can be LP154WT1-SJA1. I'm wondering what do you have.

                  Also I ordered MacBook Pro 15" late 2013. Which is LG (A019), LP154WT1-SJE1, also with Nvidia.

                  The command for terminal

                  ioreg -lw0 | grep EDID | sed "/[^<]*</s///" | xxd -p -r | strings -6

                  Marionberry998

                  I don't have access to that computer at the moment, sorry. I'll definitely let you know the specs when I can.

                  Marionberry998

                  Well done! I couldn't find that when I had a look. I tried your ioreg command but it doesn't work these days… Don't know why. The older one in the link you found returns the result as before.

                  dev