The camera does pick it up but I think I was led astray by the sensor noise which also flickers especially in the darker colors. During testing I have to turn the backlight brightness to 100% to reduce the impact of camera sensor noise. That is what I was trying to find a "real" high speed camera. I will also have to remove the T480s as a recommendation to be safe. Ultimately, the solution is software plus high enough refresh rate to more closely mimic reality. We are so close but not there yet!
Products to try or avoid? PWM Flicker and Temporal Dithering Testing
photon78s can you force discrete only? If you don't then the Intel igpu may output to screen which the newer Intel igpu are known to be really bad on the eyes. Normally requires ditherig software for Intel but even then people say it still doesn't work on new igpu. Color control I believe is for discrete Nvidia only
- Edited
Yes, I have it set to discrete in BIOS and under device manager, I only see the Nvidia gpu not the intel iGPU. I am wondering if I am just video recording pixel inversion given mention of this post over at the Stillcolor discussion:
https://ledstrain.org/d/1075-apple-miniled-products-2021/8
This quote from Seagull?
This brings me onto something I think about a lot. Why do people hate intel graphics so much? I think it’s not because intel graphics dither (they don’t, I’ve tested lots of them). I think people get pain from intel graphics because they are not temporally dithering! So they are seeing a strong half framerate flicker, undiluted by temporal dithering. Something I think will be worse on laptops where their high DPI screens will have more voltage irregularities creating a stronger LCD inversion flicker.
Personally, I have a monitor that I can only use with GPUs which dither. If I hook up my non dithering intel GPU I get pain. The above is the best explanation I have for that.
Hey - what is the best way to measure temporal dithering? Microsocope for phone? which one, where to get?
- Edited
I use this: https://carson.com/product/mp-250-led-lighted-pocket-microscope/
I use 240 fps slow motion camera mode on my samsung s10+ but some newer phones can do higher fps which is good for testing the higher refresh rate screens.
You will be able to see pixel flicker from either pixel inversion and dithering or both. The problem is I have yet to find anything where the image is 100% stable.
I also would record at 100% backlight brightness to help factor out PWM and low video quality due to low light noise.
Just posting for reference of prior work on dithering (using capture card and videodiff software)
- Edited
I have 1809 running on the second hard drive of the 7i and install the latest studio driver from nvidia to enable 240 fps refresh rate (otherwise the panel is stuck at 64Hz). Thanks for the suggestion!
Laptop is set to discrete GPU, color control dithering disabled.
Difficult to say if this is any better at first glance both holistically and under the scope. I'm not able to get the full raw 240 fps video from the phone camera app just a slowed down version at 30 fps on playback. Still, I was expecting to see more flickering (filmed on the middle part of the lagrom gradient). If someone is watching the video, notice how when I move the camera so that the top left flickering pixels enter the center area, the pixels stops flashing? That is because their is less light captured there and the noise of the phone camera sensor is more visible which itself is a temporally flickering effect.
If you look at the video, I think it is slightly better. However as you know, the 240 fps refresh is the same framerate as the supposed slow mo mode of the samsung so I don't have the ideal testing gear. I briefly looked the video of it set to 60Hz refresh but it was flickering like usual in an alternating pattern (pixel inversion?). I haven't installed the secondary update, will let you know when I test with that.
Symptoms have improved a lot for me over the 60Hz setting I was using earlier last year. I don't get headaches or migraines, just some moderate eye strain over a last couple of weeks. But then I have been using it not as much. I still feel the internal panel is slightly less straining than the LG although both are huge improvements over the "10 bit" Eizo.
I haven't looked at the videos since I'm sensitive to flicker. Ohhh the manual update is a must because that's the build/update ver that is safe. Just the iso alone could be a problem till you update with that manual update. Theres no iso with the update pre installed unfortunately.
Gotcha I mean it doesn't sound terrible terrible. I just wonder if 1809 with manual update will be noticeable 
photon78s this was posted in the led eye strain telegram group. You can see how newer windows shimmers/flickers while 1809 doesn't. https://imgur.com/a/ogocBtt
- Edited
Interesting video. I'm now using the 1809 with the manual update installed. The build version is 17763.1098. Is this correct? All I can say is the somehow the maximum brightness is lower than on Win 11 making it seem calmer to me. Through the scope, it is see hard to tell if all I see is just noise flickering from the camera sensor or dithering or inversion (this might be a good sign). If you have testing 1809 to work on your other machines, then this is probably the way to go if/when you decide to test your 7i. Also, in appearance and performance, I turned everything off (adjust for best performance). On the lagrom gradient banding page, I see more banding.
- Edited
Game ready driver 537.34 - Sept 12 2023
https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/211638/en-us
Studio 537.42 - Sept 21 2023
https://www.nvidia.com/download/driverResults.aspx/211716/en-us
I used their advanced search tool:
https://www.nvidia.com/download/find.aspx
A friend modified a GTX driver(even older) with rtx GPU hardware id in the past and it ran fine without ray tracing. Might be another option if you ever wanted to go that route for any testing haha.
- Edited
Thank you!
I installed 1809 with the update on the T480s (with B140QAN2.3 panel) and it has clearly visible banding. The Lagrom gradient even seems to animate the banding and then stop (minimizing and opening the browser would do that). However, under the microscope measuring the gradient, it is almost completely "stable" and clearly more stable than the 7i on 1809 (might be due to low max backlight brightness causing noise). Perhaps now I am seeing mostly noise + pixel inversion.
This is just a 60 Hz panel so this is even more interesting. The gpu is the outdated Intel UHD Graphics 620 not Iris Xe. Also the panel can get significantly brighter than the 7i running 1809 making recording have less camera sensor noise.
For the less flicker sensitive who want to check out videos (T480s 60Hz 1809 best case versus Legion 7i 60Hz Windows 1 23H2 worst case videos of a darker transition part of the lagrom gradient):
https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fo/adv3uvxm0tvi6hndxli2p/h?rlkey=kcsyjrq6p5bf6qprdco9gx4ed&dl=0
Tentatively, the 60Hz T480s running 1809 is similar to the 240Hz 7i running1809 and better than the 7i at 240Hz running 23H2. The worst flickering is with the 7i at 60Hz running the latest 23H2 update.
Btw the panel in 7i pro appears to be this. https://panelook.com/modeldetail.php?id=61681
It shows it as 10bit but I wonder if it's really 8+2frc which is why 60Hz seems to be dithering. Maybe 8bpc forced in Nvidia control panel would have different results under the microscope.