- Edited
chahahc Another thing I thought of is even if you buy a monitor buy a different company you have to research what panel is it. A lot of these guys use the same panel and sell them to all the companies. That's why all the 240HZ monitors all mostly performed the same. I think the Benq with Dyac was considered the best by Blur Busters. Another example is all the OLED laptops coming out this year are all useless and all the same because they are all supplied by Samsung. As far as I can tell the only one that got slightly tweaked and I bet it's still using PWM like all the rest of them is the Dell one because it has been altered a little to lower the blue light. That's why a lot of new monitors coming out this year are creating excitement as there is new panels in them and we are seeing a lot of improvements over LED's short comings. A lot of people talk about what different connections do to have an effect on people. I'm a big believer that some people on here would show good results with different HDMI versions as there is a difference in the information processed to the screen. HDMI 2.1 could be good for all of us thanks to quick frame transport. https://forums.blurbusters.com/viewtopic.php?f=10&t=5518 A lot of it is over my head but I get the jist of it. Also do a search on the differences between HDMI 2 and 2.1 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=I0_qxjt7WtY I think the new LG OLED is the first device to support 2.1 at the moment so we are waiting for another device to connect to it. So someone email Sony to hurry up and release a PS5 with HDMI 2.1. I do believe we have computer monitors with HDMI 2.0 vs Hdmi 1.4 so you probably will get different results there. also I'm aware there is different DVI versions probably another way to get results. Just something else to think about in the millions of problems surrounding screens these days.