photon78s I'll start testing more. The svd 32 rlcd I did test the EF as seen here https://imgur.com/a/Wz1EFjt
I haven't really tried the svd btw for eye comfort because I found out it's 6+2frc.. just don't wanna risk it right now. Did peak a few times at it is all.

I tried a tv in my house and it didn't react like the svd. I mainly got the Rf meters to check earbuds which ALL AIRPODS ARE BAD BAD. Sony xm5, OnePlus buds, status 3anc are much lower for example. The emf390 is a all in one but it's alot better than trifield one. The acoustimeter is more sensitive so it's good to scan rooms with.

    jordan

    I had an XM3 or 4 (don't remember) but I never used it in bluetooth mode, just wired headphone jack. I have not tried those low emf headphones that use an air tube. Where practical or convenient, I just use speakers or traditional wired headphones.

      photon78s I'll test every monitor I end up trying tho. I kinda went off topic with headphones haha. But I have tried aircom air tubes and they aren't bad, was expecting worse.

        jordan

        Headphones paired with your phone are a huge source of potential risk (not to mention distraction, addiction, etc.). I find it really troubling that more and more "younger" folks are also having to do all of this.

        It's probably not a good idea to be using the Opple Light Master via bluetooth as well.

        The Safe and Sound Pro II RF Meter display flickers at regular camera visible frequencies. No need for me to upload video.

        https://safelivingtechnologies.com/products/safe-and-sound-pro-ii-rf-meter.html

        The flicker sensitive do not care about the emf sensitive and the emf aware are not concerned with their own product's display flicker.

          photon78s I have the GQ-EMF390 which is emf/rf/EF meter that uses a rlcd (I leave backlight disabled)

          Also the acoustimeter am10 RF meter I have as well. I don't think it flickers either

            jordan

            Now I see why you were asking about EMF or EF. Different products use the term "EMF" differently. For example, the trifield says AC magnetic field (units of milligauss).

            Hard to say in my personal experience if it is EMF, EF, RF, dirty electricity or all of the above as trigger. How do you feel about using these displays you are testing at a greater distance than normal away? As you know, the intensity drops off (attenuates) with distance.

              photon78s acoustimeter definitely has the best sensitivity as my router is downstairs, I have a Sonos one wifi speaker in my bedroom, it will pickup the rf between them. It's an awesome meter I found out the Rf is going through where my head would be on my bed.. I don't keep the speaker plugged in anymore after that. The GQ one also isn't too bad either, I did research before buying them. I think the trifield requires you to be right on the source to pick it up from what I heard.

              The acoustimeter am10 btw has an audio mode that I can hear the wifi router frequency, when the router is unplugged it goes away and you can hear other frequencies which helps to find the source device of whatever your picking up.

                jordan

                Great that you found these things. I do not use the trifield (model 100XE) for RF. I only use it for a rough idea of alternating current magnetic field and electric field levels. For RF, it is not able to catch the more modern types of pulsed high frequency signals.

                  photon78s gotcha. I think the trifield is ok for emf but RF I heard it's not good. I think both of my devices can go up to 8 or 10ghz supposedly

                    photon78s that's why I didn't consider buying those meters. Might have to make our own with a raspberry pi or something 🙄 wish they could just use a basic display.

                    AlanSmith

                    An interesting procedure from the author/emf consultant. Of course if you know, you know.

                    dev