You certainly repeat mostly what is written online but it is not all true for everyone.
I agree that red tinted would block more than yellow tinted which in turn would block more than clear with only "blue light" reflecting. But seeing everything red is not great. I explained already that if you see blue/violet reflections when you look at them from the sides they are doing their job. If they block blue/violet they block UV too. Do you know how hard it would be to block only blue/violet but not UV. Narrow band filters are much harder to create.
What is the shortest wavelength your spectrometer can detect? Is it only for visible light? Can you tell its model?
I agree LEDs are terrible and PWM even more so. Incandescent is the natural black body spectrum. Halogen being the perfect mix of natural + efficient + long lasting + cheap. Guess which is hardest to find these days … halogen.
LED actually emit UV and convert it down to visible using different phosphors. Do they convert 100% of the UV to visible? Someone with a good spectrometer could tell us.
PWM cant be the only problem. I tested 12 volt LED strips off of a battery … still bad without glasses. Guess what, glasses help me even with PWM. I mean it still bad after a while but there is a difference. I suspect PWM + UV is the worst case. Incandescent vary a little with the mains frequency but we dont have a problem with them.
There is no natural process in our body that requires us to stare at a UV source (even very low levels of UV) for hours. It adds up.
Adding power to lens may help if someone needs it but it adds additional distortion same as red/yellow tint. I just say to be careful and only do it if the benefit would outweigh the considerable downsides for the specific person. You talk about studies testing lots of people but we both know that very few of them have the exact same problem like us. I just give you one example where both tint and power make it worse. For me at least. Everyone should test for themselves and this is not expensive to try.