HealthAwareUser Miravision with the G 2025 is BS. It was put under a microscope and has zero dithering.
For what it's worth, I am using the G55 currently, and I think it works very well, being a good compromise between good specs with a comfortable and usable non-OLED screen. Also has a headphone jack if that matters to you.
If for whatever reason you try the G55 and it doesn't work for you, even after following these steps:
https://ledstrain.org/d/3423-success-in-disabling-temporal-dither-how-to/
Then try the G 2025. G 2025 is suited to the most sensitive users. I am doing fine enough with the G55 and I believe it is a somewhat better device if you can use it comfortably.
Moto G Stylus 2025 is OLED. It's not as comfortable as LCD, but you can make it work if you try these steps:
https://ledstrain.org/d/3758-having-some-success-with-oled
There is a Moto G 56 as well that may offer some meaningful improvements over the G55, in a few areas, but I have no issues right now with the G55. Works very well for me. I even like the crude haptics, which remind me of arcade games.
One benefit of the Stylus 2025 is that it likely has circular polarization. That means you can use polarized lenses in landscape mode without having the picture darken. The LCD phones use vertical polarization except for the TCL NXTPAPER. Using polarized lenses can in itself be an effective antidote to eye strain, so circular polarization can be quite valuable to some.
However, I'm guessing the Stylys 2025 has a lot of glare in bright environments, like the Edge. The plastic OLED screen is like an oil slick. Glossy as hell.
Also of note: the G55 gets very dim using the built-in brightness control. It gets even dimmer than the G 2025. This is quite valuable in dark rooms, and LED backlighting definitely is superior in dark environments vs OLED without any backlighting. Besides that, LCD is a plus for those like me working with lots of white mode content. Even if I have dark mode set, just about every financial statement I open is a PDF in white mode. Even OLED fans agree LCD is superior to OLED with light content.
Overlay programs like Extra Dim supposedly degrade the picture somewhat, so it is better if you can avoid it, and with the G55 you certainly can. You can leave on adaptive brightness the G55 and it has a great brightness range for all environments.
G55 is nice and narrow, almost the same width as the Edge. G55 is 74 mm and Edge is 73 mm. Both fit nicely in the hand. G75 and G 2025 are noticeably wider and not as enjoyable in the hand at least for me.
Motorola LCD phones have no PWM/flicker. Their pOLED phones also are superior to most others due to flicker prevention and relatively low modulation. However, if you are a heavier user, you'll definitely benefit from LCD vs even the best tuned OLED. LCD just is more comfortable for those doing more with their screens. The blacklight is DC dimmed and the pixels don't need the current constantly adjusted. LCD is more calming on the body at least in my experience. Could it be psychosomatic? Could be, but repeatedly OLED causes me general tension and eye tiring that isn't the same with LCD. If you have both OLED and LCD phones side by side, you'll see 1: there isn't a lot of difference in the picture quality and 2. the LCD likely is significantly more calming and comfortable, especially as you increase your usage.
Someone said even 4000 Hz PWM bothers him. Is it possible the brain actually perceives 4000 Hz PWM? How else would it cause him symptoms?
LCD ensures we have the most stable picture possible. The fact OLED is heavily pushed and LCD is not doesn't mean OLED is better for us. Not by a long shot.